Monday, August 09, 2010

Reading Like A Writer

The illustrious Nathan Bransford wrote an awesome blog post recently. Well, he often writes awesome blog posts, but this one was about how a writer should never ask himself a certain question while reading someone else’s story: Did I like it? Nathan shared some great insight as to why writers shouldn’t ask this, and there’s some interesting thoughts in the comments. So, if you haven’t read this yet, you should.

I loved Nathan’s post so much that I wanted to leave a comment saying so, but words failed me. The best I could come up with was ‘yeah, high five!’ Um...<blushing>...I think I’ve been heavily influenced by my two boys running around the house all summer. :) Anyway, it’s been several days, and I’ve had the chance to think over his post and articulate some thoughts. Rather than put them in the comments section on Nathan’s blog, I decided to write them here.

I actually slightly disagree with Nathan. I think it’s okay to ask yourself ‘did I like this?’ because liking or not liking a book is a big part of the industry. That said, a writer should never stop there. If you do, then you’re not learning anything. Nathan says that a writer should always ask this question: did the author accomplish what he set out to accomplish? Nathan, you are a genius. :)

To properly answer this question, two things much happen. 1) The reader must attempt to put himself in the author’s shoes and figure out what he intended to accomplish with his story. 2) The reader must look at the story itself and figure out what it actually accomplished. Both of these are extremely difficult to do, but I think a good writer needs to be able to do this.

For me, reading is as much a part of learning as taking classes on craft, going to conferences, actual writing, etc. I do book reviews on my blog every week, and I always attempt to answer Nathan's question. The books I choose to review are ones that gave me a strong reaction, positive or negative, and have much to explore in the way of craft. Even if my reaction was strongly negative, I will examine and analyze the good parts, because they’re always there (granted, some books have more than others). If there was nothing good, then it never would have gotten published in the first place. An astute writer will be able to find the good things, even if she didn’t love the book. Even if she hated the book.

An easy reaction to a book one hates is ‘how did this crap get published?’ I hear this often, and have been guilty of saying it (in private) myself. You know what? It doesn’t matter how it got published. What matters is that it did get published, and there’s nothing you or I can do about it...except maybe one thing: we can learn from it. Someone, somewhere, connected with this book, and figuring out what sparked that connection can only add to an writer’s toolbox.

As writers, I think it’s imperative to read everything we can get our hands on, and then pick apart each story. What worked well? What could have been done better? What would we have done differently? Asking these questions is a good start toward dissecting a story and creating a good learning experience. You can spend as much or as little time on the pieces as you like, and you might be surprised at how much you see once you pull it apart.

11 comments:

Karen Amanda Hooper said...

I agree too. High five! lol. I really dislike high-fiving in real life, but I'll do it virtually.

Reading is the best way to become a better writer.

Tabitha said...

LOL!! :) My boys high-five instead of shaking hands. It's kind of seared into my brain as a positive reaction now. :)

"Reading is the best way to become a better writer."
EXACTLY! :)

Bish Denham said...

Excellent post Tabitha. I am guilty of reading because I like to read and want to be taken some place I've never been. I rarely read to analyze what works for me or doesn't. I have tried but when I do I lose interest in what I'm reading! GAK.

I admire people such as yourself who review books so well.

Bradmouth said...

Reading the Artemis Fowl series helped me find my voice, or more make me feel like it was okay to break out of certain conventions.

And reading Phillip Pullman taught me that there is a writing style that I wish to avoid.

I also think it's a tad pretentious to say writers should never "like or dislike." I see his point, we should be focusing on the why, but still...

Of course, I've been called, "prone to conflict."

Great blog!

theBrad (verla tag)
bradmouth.com
facebook.ccom/bradmouth

Tabitha said...

Bish - thanks. :) And you never know, you're probably still picking up all kinds of great stuff even by not consciously looking for it. :)

theBrad - thanks! Personally, I think being 'prone to conflict' is a good thing, because it means you don't believe something just because someone 'says so.' I prefer to find my own answers, too. :)

cleemckenzie said...

Can't say how many books I've read after reading bad reviews and said,"But that book was really good. I connected with those characters." Great post as usual.

Solvang Sherrie said...

You are always so good at articulating your thoughts!

I think the more I write, the harder it is for me to separate that part of my brain and just lose myself in a book. I love authors who can do that for me, who write so effortlessly that I hold my breath and keep turning the pages.

Brian James said...

As a writer, if I don't like a book, I always try to figure out why I didn't like it. Especially if the reason is because of a shortcoming of the text rather than a matter of taste. This is great way to avoid similar mistakes in my own work.

writerjenn said...

I'll be one of the first to acknowledge the brilliance of Mr. B., although I found myself adjusting the rule a bit, as some of his commenters did:
Figure out why you liked it. Or at least: Figure out what people like about it, whether you like it or not.

I don't think there's any harm in liking or not liking a book, but he's right that, for a writer, the reading process shouldn't stop there. It may begin there, and a writer has a lot more to gain from a text than a personal thumbs up or down.

Natalie Aguirre said...

Great post. And thanks for telling us to read Nathan's post too. I have to admit that I often want to read a book just to enjoy it and be sucked into the story. Though as an author, I know I'm not learning as much as I can. I'll have to try to step back a bit.

beth said...

I just read the story of how you found your agent. Thank you for sharing that. It was encouraging. And thank you visiting my blog.