Recently, I posted
about how to keep descriptions from sounding like laundry lists.
Today I want to talk about how you can create a description that will make the
reader feel like he’s stepped into your story. The key to doing this? Senses.
Sight is, by far, the
dominant sense for most people and that’s what automatically gets put on the
page. But there are four others: sound, taste, touch, and smell. These senses
are always there and our brains process them even if we’re not aware of it. We
hear a buzzing next to our ears and swat away the insect before we’ve had time to
think about it. We smell something rotting in the trash and wrinkle our noses.
We touch something hot and our hands jerk away involuntarily. We try a new food
and our brains automatically compare the taste to other experiences—for example,
to me, grilled vegetables taste like summer, but oysters taste like salty
mucus. :)
Without all of these
senses, your story will feel two dimensional. Including all of them in your
story will bring in that third dimension. The only exception, of course, is if
your main character is missing a sense for whatever reason. I.E. he is blind,
deaf, etc, and then your story will contain at least some elements of how his
other senses compensate for the missing one. In either case, though, the senses
still need to be there.
There’s another bonus
to this as well: it will add another dimension to your character. I’ve written
countless exercises where my main character performs a mundane task, and I
focus on bringing out what he notices and how it affects him. I hate the smell
of stargazer lilies, but I know people who love it. It baffles me, but these
differences in taste are what make us individuals. Including details like this give
my characters a chance to show themselves, round them out, and help my readers
better understand them.
It’s a difficult thing to
do because, as writers, we have to consciously pay attention to how our brains
process our senses, and then we have to imagine how our characters’ brains will
process their senses. It requires taking a step back from ourselves and
analyzing our experiences objectively. No easy feat. But, if you can figure out
a way to do this, you’ll be well on your way to creating a 3-D character in a
3-D story.
Challenge:
Write one full page
which only consists of a description of someone walking through a door. Pay attention to the details around that
person and use all five senses.
There are many mundane
tasks your character can do in writing exercises like this, and I recommend
trying as many as possible. I’ve just included one in this exercise, but feel
free to change it to whatever you want. Or do multiple! If you feel up to it,
include yours in the comments. We’d love to read them. :) I will be sharing one
of mine next week…
7 comments:
It will be interesting to read the descriptions of a very ordinary act. This should stir the creative juices!
Because I write a lot of PB texts, I have to remember to switch the ‘description button’ on when I write chapter books or MG. Then I have to turn if off for the PB. This is where the art comes in.
I have an oversensitive nose so I like to use smell in my stories. Taste is the one I need to get in my work more. Sight, sound, and touch are easy--and of course I already mention my smell obsession.
Thanks for the tips. I do not like writing descriptions. I can use all the help I can get.
Challenge accepted!
Lee - yeah, my thoughts exactly!
Mirka - that's got to be hard to switch between such different age groups. I don't have the patience for it, and my hat goes off to all who can write picture books! :)
Kelly - taste is the one I love to work in taste (we're big foodies in my family) but I tend to forget about smell. How funny that we're opposites! :)
Natalie - I never used to like them, either. I always felt like I was getting bogged down in the mundane. After years of practice, though, I kind of like them now. :)
Michelle - awesome! Hope you'll share!
This was great. I hate describing things and I often dread it, but recently I've realized that less is more; I don't have to describe every damn thing.
You affirmed that here, so thanks!
Post a Comment