Monday, January 30, 2012

Challenge: Describe Some Action, Part Two


Last week, I wrote a post about bringing in action when describing your characters so it doesn’t sound like a laundry list. Today, I want to talk about describing other things.

Object description is even more likely to sound like a laundry list because objects don’t move. If it doesn’t move, how can the description seem active? Well, there are plenty of options.

One way is to use active verbs in the description, giving the object its own personality. The curve of a statue could be sweeping. A pendant could be shaped like a tear drop, heavy and drooping. A rug could be bright and bold, and a table could be crisp and shiny.

Of course, even if you use active verbs like these, your description will still sound like a laundry list unless you add a key element: your characters. After all, who perceives these objects? They do! Show us the object through them—how they perceive it, what feelings they evoke, how they interact with them, et—and it will be much easier to introduce action. Especially since people can actually do things while objects pretty much just sit there.

Really, though, it all depends on what's going on in the story, and how important that object is. If it's just an illustration of something already established, then there's not much needed. For example:
She arranged the stack of magazines on the polished table.

Here, the table is just adding to the character, how she wants everything 'just so.' The table doesn't mean anything to her, except to look nice. In fact, she probably doesn't even think about it being there.

But if an object means something to a character, then she will notice far more details. For example:
The pendant dangled from its gold chain, a tear-drop-shaped piece of carved stone. The swooping scroll design faded into the pocked and worn surface. I turned it over. It was heavier than I expected, and...warm. The way stone feels when it’s been sitting in the sun for a long time. My fingers kind of tingled, too.

Here, the character is interacting with this pendant and, at the same time, forming a connection to it. So, she notices far more details about it. And, the more active your verbs are, the more vivid your description will be, the more you will engage your reader.

Challenge:
Take an inanimate object from your childhood (or some other time in your life) and describe it using active verbs. The object can’t move by itself, and you’re not allowed to interact with it to make it move. Instead, focus on the kinds of verbs you use to describe it, as well as the emotions it evokes in you. 

Feel free to share your work here in the comments, or keep it to yourself. Your choice.

Next week, I want to get into the nitty gritty of describing setting. I think setting should be treated as another character, but we’ll get more into that next week. :)

5 comments:

Catherine Stine said...

She raised the tea to her mouth, taking care not to cut her lip on the chipped part. Cloth napkins were old-fashioned but they sure saved on buying paper ones, because you could keep on washing them until the seams frayed.

How was that to show this girl was hurting for $, yet had pride in style? (objects: chipped teacup, cloth napkins)

Kelly Hashway said...

Great examples, Tabitha! You definitely made description exciting to read as opposed to something to skim over.

Tabitha Olson said...

Catherine - that's great! Everything is through the eyes of the character.

Kelly - thanks! :)

Brenda Hyde said...

I'm always fearful of over describing. How is this:

The silver charm bracelet dangled on her slender wrist as she combed through her long, freshly washed hair.

Tabitha Olson said...

Yep, we get the charm in action as the character moves. :)